US embassy officials bombed in Kabul

US embassy officials bombed in Kabul -News-World-Asia-TimesOnline:

"A number of US embassy officials were wounded and a 15-year-old Afghan civilian killed when a Taleban suicide car bomber blew himself up next to a convoy in Kabul this morning.

The explosion took place as the convoy made its way through a road located two miles from the embassy, scattering debris around the motorcade as well as passing pedestrians."

Look how freely they speak in their emails?

TPMmuckraker March 15, 2007:


"In the email, which has the subject line 'Re: Question from Karl Rove,' Kyle Sampson, who was then at the Justice Department, discusses with then-deputy White House Counsel David Leitch the idea of replacing '15-20 percent of the current U.S. Attorneys,' because '80-85 percent, I would guess, are doing a great job, are loyal Bushies, etc.'"

"[I]f Karl thinks there would be poliitical will to do it, then so do I," Sampson concludes.


UPDATE: It is looking more and more like the loyal Bushies have good reason to write so openly and freely in their emails even when the Presidential Records Act (PRA) is supposed to require the indexing and preservation of all Administration written communication -- They're using RNC email addresses from inside the White House and the Department of Justice.

America: The State of the Nation - OhmyNews International

Find any news of these points?

America: The State of the Nation - OhmyNews International:

1. "it has been announced that Pelosi and her Senate counterpart, Harry Reid, will make a bipartisan display of unity in support of Israel, by appearing alongside Dick Cheney at the March meeting of the ultra-reactionary American Israel Public Affairs Committee. AIPAC has dominated American foreign policy for decades, strengthened since 2000 by the Project for a New American Century, the Bush shadow cabinet, which drew up the blueprints for American empire and the conquest of Iraq and Iran."

2. The European Union increased its abhorrence of the CIA kidnapping of innocent people on the streets of European cities, and their rendition to nations prepared to torture them in exchange for U.S. largesse. Both Italy and Germany have begun prosecutions on these illegal practices.

Reposited for Posterity's Sake

The Raw Story | Ex-White House adviser guilty of 4 of 5 counts, will appeal:

"Former White House adviser I. Lewis 'Scooter' Libby has been found guilty of four of five charges, including perjury and obstruction of justice, in the federal court proceedings that resulting from the investigation of the outing of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson."

Diebold Machines Become Liability to Bottom Line?

Wired: AP Technology and Business News from the Outside World on Wired.com:

"CLEVELAND (AP) -- Diebold Inc. saw great potential in the modernization of elections equipment. Now, analysts say, executives may be angling for ways to dump its e-voting subsidiary that's widely seen as tarnishing the company's reputation."

BSG S3E16 [spoilers below]

Not sure if you all have managed to see this yet, but Chief at one point actually says, "It's called a General Strike." (just before Adama threatens to kill Callie).

So, apparently the problems of a class society can be solved in a 3 minute drunk conversation between the Chief and The Pres. Only abstractly of course. My only hope is that the fact that he refuses another drink implies that he is already drunk and that what comes next is "cloud talk" so to speak.

Curiouser and Curiouser

(From RAWSTORY)

AP WIRE: "Vice President Dick Cheney made a visit to the hospital today after experiencing what his office called some 'discomfort' following his recent trip overseas," the Associated Press reports. "A statement from cheney's office said an ultrasound revealed a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or 'blood clot' in his left lower leg and added his doctors will treat him with blood thinning medication for several months."

Submitted without comment

FT.com / World / US & Canada - Yellow ribbons dwindle with war support: "Magnet America, the largest manufacturer of the product, has seen sales fall from a peak of 1.2m in August 2004 to about 4,000 a month and now has an unsold stockpile of about 1m magnets."

On Libby Jury

Okay - my only speculative post on the Libby jury deliberations:

After a short day of deliberating today, the jury left two questions for the judge to answer for them at the start of the day Monday. You can see the actual handwritten notes here.

Ignoring the first question, I want to wager two guesses about what we can tell about jury from its contents. We'll see if I'm right.

Here is the content of the second jury question:

We would like clarification of the term "reasonble doubt." Specifically, is it necessary for the government to present evidence that it is not humanely possible for someone not to recall an event in order to find guilt beyond a reasonble doubt?

Oh, come on. The tortured phrasing? The ridiculous, almost rhetorical nature of the question ("it is not humanely possible...to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt")? One or more potential holdout jurors have been pinned to a very specific (and indefensible) interpretation of reasonable doubt and the burdens of proof, and the unifed block of jurors are sending it up for the smackdown. Don't forget, they sent out a note requesting a dictionary earlier this week and were told they could not have one by the judge.

Even more, I think you can read today's note as strongly suggesting that that a strong majority or supermajority have been able to force the potential holdout juror that it is was their responsibility to propose a definition of "reasonable doubt" that the judge will either confirm or reject. Since the dictionary couldn't be used to point out that "reasonable" and "not humanely possible" only have in common the fact that you can find the words in the same book, the supermajority of jurors are forcing the holdout into a dilemma of their own making.

Why is it likely that there is only one (or at most two) potential holdout jurors?

1. the language of the definition is so tortured with its double (or is it triple?) negation, that it doesn't seem likely that the contents of the defintion are a product of human collaborative effort. (If you look at the note, it has a couple of inserted words, suggesting that the group didn't discuss how exactly to formulate a very precise question. Hell, even the word "specifically" is added via insert. You can almost hear the foreperson now: "Alright, we're holding you to this: What is your specific threshold of doubt, beyond which you would agree that it is not reasonable for Libby to 'forget' what nine others remember pretty clearly? Come on, what is it? And be specific!"

2. Along these same lines -- only a strong majority could exert enough power in small group deliberations to force an individual member of the jury to commit themselves to one specific defintion in the first place. Even two or three people (or even one if they heldout strong enough) could generate enough solidarity and good will among the others to get them accept some other position as at least "reasonable". All that has to be said is that "Sorry gang, but I have doubts that the prosecution proved the charge. I can't just stop having them. And to me, a reasonable person, that means that the charge hasn't been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. " Ding dong, hung jury. No no. In our case the potential hold out has been forced to spell out their ridiculous supposition and subject it to open scrutiny of the embodiment of the law, the judge. That means the majority is strong enough to force the minority into an agreement to accept the judge's view of "reasonable doubt" as dispositive. Doubt is such a nebulous thing that I find it hard to believe that anything but a strong and vocal and clear majority could force deliberation to such a head.

3. Also, the ridiculous phrasing strongly suggests that there wasn't a lot of time given to the potential holdout for revision. "Why specifically do you think that the prosecution hasn't proven beyond reasonable doubt? What is your "reasonable doubt"? Oh? Because humans aren't perfect and do forget things? And, what's that you say? The prosecution never ever proved that humans can't forget things, so its still possible that Libby did forget things? Fine - we're sending this up to the judge right now, and asking him if it is okay to apply the standard of guilt you want to use. If the judge comes back saying that the standard we apply must be less that requiring the prosecution to prove that, as you said, "it is not humanely possible for a person not to recall an event" then you must admit you have no reasonble doubt about the defendant's guilt." Without any time to revise you end up with an off-the-cuff and under pressure 'shot in the dark' like an appeal to "I doubt because I've seen insufficient evidence that humans can't forget things." The point the potential holdout would have loved to have made -- if not under such pressure of time -- appears to be something like "Libby is a human, and that under certain circumstances humans can forget even the most amazing things. And I see several reasons for thinking that these were extraordinary times in the VP office., etc., etc.." Alas, a strong, clear majority who see the ridiculousness of this claim just the same, have agreed to exercise their collective power and not give endless time for perfecting the bullshit. Whether that is good or bad, meh.

ps. The other question the jury sent out today concerned a clarification of Charge I - the obstruction of justice charge. I've read several commentators this afternoon who interpreted this as an indication that either the jury is skipping around the charges (and therefore missing the forest for the trees) or that they're stuck even after so many days. Since I'm speculating, I'll wager that they've convicted (or will convict once "reasonable doubt" is settled) on all counts except Obstruction, and now have returned to it as the most serious and the charge that depends on the others. If they were going to aquit on all other counts II-V, would you really have a need to clarify the language in the overraching obstruction charge? And unless our single holdout digs in their heals, a guilty verdict on all counts comes back Tuesday early AM at the latest.

Fitzgerald’s Rebuttal

Today I happily make my return to blogging with just a couple of quoted sentences. Today saw closing arguments in the Libby trial. And after years of reading between the lines of Fitzgerald's memos and press releases and questions, we finally find him tipping his hand.

He's been after Dick all along, and the Libby thing was an attempted triangulation on the old bastard just like Fitz did in the Illinois governor case and other RICO cases. What I would have given to have been in the court room to hear Fitz articulate each vowel and consonant. (To think, I was in DC all weekend and should have just stayed a day longer).

Anyway, here is the moment I've thought was coming for some time...


Libby Live: Fitzgerald’s Rebuttal (from emptywheel's indispensible live-blogging of the trial)

"There is a cloud over the VP. He wrote those columns, he had those meetings, He sent Libby off to the meeting with Judy. Where Plame was discussed. That cloud remains because the denfendant obstructed justice. That cloud was there. That cloud is something that we just can't pretend isn't there."

BSG Season 4

the TV addict » Blog Archive » The LA TIMES is reporting that the Sci Fi Channel is expected to announce tomorrow that it has renewed the critically acclaimed (yet little watched) series for a fourth season. Thirteen new episodes of BATTLESTAR GALACTICA will be produced this summer to premiere in January 2008.

Guardian: US ready for Iran Strike in spring

While I am still skeptical that something like this is really in the works, some things of note appear in this article:
1. Not much new in terms of the build-up (the second carrier group, etc.) Except the planning: "US preparations for an air strike against Iran are at an advanced stage, in spite of repeated public denials by the Bush administration, according to informed sources in Washington.

The present military build-up in the Gulf would allow the US to mount an attack by the spring. But the sources said that if there was an attack, it was more likely next year, just before Mr Bush leaves office."
[snip]
Colonel Sam Gardiner, a former air force officer who has carried out war games with Iran as the target, supported the view that planning for an air strike was under way: "Gates said there is no planning for war. We know this is not true. He possibly meant there is no plan for an immediate strike. It was sloppy wording.

"All the moves being made over the last few weeks are consistent with what you would do if you were going to do an air strike. We have to throw away the notion the US could not do it because it is too tied up in Iraq. It is an air operation."

2. The risk of accidental escalation by having the ships there, conducting war games, and the Iranians own saber-rattling and test launches.
"The danger is that the build-up could spark an accidental war. Iranian officials said on Thursday that they had tested missiles capable of hitting warships in the Gulf."

3. That the US has sold nuclear tipped bunker-busters to Israel.
"Raymond Tanter, founder of the Iran Policy Committee, which includes former officials from the White House, state department and intelligence services, is a leading advocate of support for the MEK. If it comes to an air strike, he favours bunker-busting bombs. "I believe the only way to get at the deeply buried sites at Natanz and Arak is probably to use bunker-buster bombs, some of which are nuclear tipped. I do not believe the US would do that but it has sold them to Israel.""

4. The American Enterprise Institute, along with Cheney and allies seem to still have sway. They think so long as it is not an invasion ala Iraq, there isn't anything to worry about (or that there is less to worry about by attacking Iran than by letting them assert regional dominance).

"Josh Muravchik, a Middle East specialist at the AEI, is among its most vocal supporters of such a strike.

"I do not think anyone in the US is talking about invasion. We have been chastened by the experience of Iraq, even a hawk like myself." But an air strike was another matter. The danger of Iran having a nuclear weapon "is not just that it might use it out of the blue but as a shield to do all sorts of mischief. I do not believe there will be any way to stop this happening other than physical force."

Mr Bush is part of the American generation that refuses to forgive Iran for the 1979-81 hostage crisis. He leaves office in January 2009 and has said repeatedly that he does not want a legacy in which Iran has achieved superpower status in the region and come close to acquiring a nuclear weapon capability. The logic of this is that if diplomatic efforts fail to persuade Iran to stop uranium enrichment then the only alternative left is to turn to the military.

Mr Muravchik is intent on holding Mr Bush to his word: "The Bush administration have said they would not allow Iran nuclear weapons. That is either bullshit or they mean it as a clear code: we will do it if we have to. I would rather believe it is not hot air.""

Unhappy Meals - Michael Pollan - New York Times

One of the better food related articles I've read in a while, but what is more interesting for our purposes is this useful and concise, though general, conception of ideology...

Unhappy Meals - Michael Pollan - New York Times: "The first thing to understand about nutritionism ? I first encountered the term in the work of an Australian sociologist of science named Gyorgy Scrinis ? is that it is not quite the same as nutrition. As the ?ism? suggests, it is not a scientific subject but an ideology. Ideologies are ways of organizing large swaths of life and experience under a set of shared but unexamined assumptions. This quality makes an ideology particularly hard to see, at least while it?s exerting its hold on your culture. A reigning ideology is a little like the weather, all pervasive and virtually inescapable. Still, we can try."

Orange snow causes concern in Siberia | Russia | Guardian Unlimited

Orange snow causes concern in Siberia | Russia | Guardian Unlimited: "There is nothing unusual about snow in the towns and endless forests of Siberia. But when locals in the small village of Pudinskoye woke up on Wednesday they immediately noticed something rather strange: the snow falling from the sky was orange.

In fact, three regions of southern Siberia - a vast area of industrial towns, pine trees and the odd bear - yesterday reported the same mysterious phenomenon. Not only was the snow not white, it also smelt bad. Most of the snow was orange. But some of it was red and yellow as well, officials confirmed, after scrambling to the affected areas to dig up samples. And it was also oily, they discovered."

Chávez Wide-Ranging Powers

So here's what the first lines of the major outlets are saying.

BBC: Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has been granted new special powers after an extraordinary assembly vote in the main square of the capital, Caracas.

Mr Chavez will now be able to rule by decree for the next 18 months.

His planned reforms will affect the energy sector, telecommunications, the economy and defence, among others.

Mr Chavez has said the legislation will transform the country into a socialist society. Opponents describe the new law as an abuse of power.

washingtonpost.com: "The line forms every day after dawn at the Spanish Consulate, hundreds of people seeking papers permitting them to abandon Venezuela for new lives in Spain. They say they are filled with despair at President Hugo Chávez's growing power, and they appear not to be alone. At other consulates in this capital, long lines form daily."

and at npr.org, the same reporter from the post, w/ his emphasis on the opposition and the totalitarian turn of Chavez and Chavezistas...

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has started his third presidential term ? one that has him serving until 2013 ? with a flurry of policy moves that have shaken his opponents and mesmerized his supporters.

Chavez wants the constitution reformed so he can run indefinitely. On Wednesday, the National Assemby is expected to give Chavez the power to push through new laws to accelerate what he calls "21st-century socialism."

CARACAS ? A Venezuelan Congress wholly loyal to President Hugo Chavez met at a downtown plaza Wednesday and gave him the authority to enact sweeping measures by presidential decree.

globeandmail.com - Hundreds of Chavez supporters wearing red ? the colour of Venezuela's ruling party ? gathered in the plaza, waving signs reading ?Socialism is democracy!? as lawmakers read out the bill who passage gave the President special powers for 18 months to transform 11 broadly defined areas, including the economy, energy and defence.

guardian.co.uk - Hugo Chávez was today poised to gain extended powers allowing him to make sweeping changes as he seeks to transform Venezuelan society.

Obama Smeared by FOX news

Well, you know. Here's the link.

Obama Announces

From Reuters.

There doesn't seem to be much coverage of this.

THE phone company went to Atlanta and all I got was this crappy two year commitment

The big concessions that ATT had to make to recreate Ma bell:
a two year commitment to net neutrality and the promise to offer 19.95 crap-ass DSL to people in the south.

From Business Week.

Ethopia bombs Somalia

From the Times
ZANZIBAR, Tanzania, Dec. 24 ? Ethiopia officially plunged into war with Somalia?s Islamist forces on Sunday, bombing targets inside Somalia and pushing ground troops deep into Somali territory in a major escalation that could turn Somalia?s internal crisis into a violent religious conflict that engulfs the entire Horn of Africa.

The coordinated assault was the first open admission by Ethiopia?s Christian-led government of its military operations inside Somalia, where ? with tacit American support ? it has been helping a weak interim government threatened by forces loyal to the Islamic clerics who control the longtime capital, Mogadishu, and much of the country.
[snip]
Some of the most frightening snipets:
The bombs also destroyed a recruitment center and a fuel depot, killing at least 10 people, witnesses reported. Hours later, the transitional troops marched into the area, and a new mayor was installed.

Many of Beledweyne?s people seemed relieved, not so much about the change in government, but because the fighting appeared to have ended so fast.

?We?re so sick of war,? said Ahmed Issa, a shopkeeper in Beledweyne. ?We?ll obey anybody.?
[snip]

In a hint of a possible direction to come, Ethiopia?s prime minister recently told American officials that he could wipe out the Islamists ? in one to two weeks.?

US Army might break Goodyear strike

From the The Financial Times ("The only paper that tells the truth"). It seems to be the only paper reporting this, but it also charges money for full access.

The US Army is considering measures to force striking workers back to their jobs at a Goodyear Tire & Rubber plant in Kansas in the face of a looming shortage of tyres for Humvee trucks and other military equipment used in Iraq and Afghanistan.

A strike involving 17,000 members of the United Steelworkers union has crippled 16 Goodyear plants in the US and Canada since October 5.

The Next Afghanistan?

I don't know if you all have been following this, but a coalition of Muslim groups have overthrown the warlords running the transitional government in Somalia, and pushed them out of most of the country. Now, Ethiopia, a mainly Christian country has thousands of "trainers" (give or take a few thousand) in the country and the Somalis want them out. Of course, its hard to know who the good guys are when one is an invader and the other is a group of religious zealots.
From the NYT today:

The inevitability of war hangs over Mogadishu, Somalia?s bullet-pocked seaside capital. But unlike the internal anarchy that has consumed the country for 15 years, the looming battle is now with Ethiopia, threatening to further destabilize the troubled Horn of Africa.

In the past week the increasingly militant Islamists in control of Mogadishu and much of the rest of the country have begun a food drive, a money drive and an AK-47 assault rifle drive, and have sent doctors and nurses, along with countless young soldiers, to the front lines.

For its part, Ethiopia, with tacit approval from the United States, has been steadily slipping soldiers across the border, trying to hold off the Islamists and shore up Somalia?s weak, unpopular and divided transitional government.

Judge's Decision on Libby's Graymail Gambit

Judge settles classified info fight in Libby case - Politics - MSNBC.com:

"WASHINGTON - A federal judge has accepted a series of redactions and substitutions proposed by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald - to be provided to I Lewis 'Scooter' Libby's defense team - which will limit what Libby can share with jurors at his upcoming trial on some of the specifics of his top-secret White House briefings."

Iran students heckle Ahmadinejad

From Al Jazeera.

AlterNet: War on Iraq: Oil for Sale: Iraq Study Group Recommends Privatization

The Report also states that its suggestions should be implemented as a whole, not piecemeal (i.e. no consideration of troop w/drawl before oil is clearly available to multinationals):

AlterNet: War on Iraq: Oil for Sale: Iraq Study Group Recommends Privatization: "In its heavily anticipated report released on Wednesday, the Iraq Study Group made at least four truly radical proposals.

The report calls for the United States to assist in privatizing Iraq's national oil industry, opening Iraq to private foreign oil and energy companies, providing direct technical assistance for the 'drafting' of a new national oil law for Iraq, and assuring that all of Iraq's oil revenues accrue to the central government."

Venezuela's Chávez Wins Decisive Victory - washingtonpost.com

Venezuela's Chávez Wins Decisive Victory - washingtonpost.com: "CARACAS, Venezuela, Dec. 3 -- By an overwhelming margin, Venezuelans reelected President Hugo Chávez on Sunday, further extending a presidency that began when the former paratrooper was swept into power eight years ago, intent on overturning Venezuela's old social order. Chávez will receive another six years in office to broaden his leftist revolution and contest American initiatives across Latin America."

War Protestor's Public Suicide in Chicago Went Unnoticed by Media

He's The Worst Ever

This is the title of Eric Foner's opinion piece in today's Post.

washingtonpost.com

Bush Fails Women With Global AIDS Plan

Figures I was not aware of and won't attest to their authenticity, but seeing this coming from Ms. Magazine is shocking. Since today is World AIDS day I thought it appropriate to recognize this form of structural violence...(had to throw that in there)

Bush Fails Women With Global AIDS Plan: "Today, 17.3 million women in the world live with HIV/AIDS, and of the 16,000 new HIV infections daily, as many as 55 percent occur among women. The proportion of women among the total infected population has risen at a steady and frightening rate: from 35 percent in 1990 to 41 percent in 1997, to 48 percent in 2004."

Bolivia passes major land reform | The Guardian | Guardian Unlimited

Let's hope it spreads...

Bolivia passes major land reform | The Guardian | Guardian Unlimited: "The Bolivian president, Evo Morales, has secured a sweeping land reform bill with the help of thousands of indigenous peasants who marched on the capital, La Paz.

To the jubilation of his supporters, Mr Morales signed the bill into law at a midnight ceremony last night after overcoming fierce resistance from senators representing large landowners.

The law is intended to reverse centuries of discrimination against the indigenous majority by seizing 77,000 square miles of land - an area around three-quarters the size of Britain - deemed unproductive or illegally owned and redistributing it to the poor."

A Quantum (Computer) Step

University of Utah News Release : November 19th, 2006:

"Nov. 19, 2006 -- A University of Utah physicist took a step toward developing a superfast computer based on the weird reality of quantum physics by showing it is feasible to read data stored in the form of the magnetic 'spins' of phosphorus atoms."

Michigan Teen Fuses Atomic Nuclei for Fun

He creates fusion in his Oakland Township home: "In the basement of his parents' Oakland Township home, tucked away in an area most aren't privy to see, Thiago is exhausting his love of physics on a project that has taken him more than two years and 1,000 hours to research and build -- a large, intricate machine that , on a small scale, creates nuclear fusion."

Leftist leads banana baron

Leftist leads banana baron in Ecuador election:

"A leftist nationalist who is friendly with Venezuela's anti-U.S. president held a commanding lead over a Bible-toting banana tycoon in Sunday's runoff presidential election in Ecuador, exit polls showed.

The tall and charismatic Rafael Correa received nearly 57 per cent of the vote, compared to 43 per cent for Alvaro Noboa, according to an exit poll conducted by CEDATOS-Gallup."

Crowd stones Iraqi PM

Calls for calm as crowd stones Iraqi PM | Top News | Reuters.co.uk: "BAGHDAD (Reuters) - The motorcade of Iraq's prime minister was pelted with stones on Sunday by fellow Shi'ites in a Baghdad slum when he paid respects to some of the 200 who died there last week in the deadliest attack since the U.S. invasion."

'More popular' President Bush defends son from 'hostile audience'

Yeah, you go original King George, you tell those pesky kids, what the hell do they know

'More popular' President Bush defends son from 'hostile audience': "The former president lost his cool with one audience member, calling him 'crazy' and recommending that he 'go back to school.'

According to the AP, a student implied that 'U.S. wars were aimed at opening markets for American companies,' and that 'globalization was contrived for America's benefit at the expense of the rest of the world,' but 'Bush was having none of it.'

'I think that's weird and it's nuts,' Bush said. 'To suggest that everything we do is because we're hungry for money, I think that's crazy.'

'I think you need to go back to school,' Bush added."

What an awkard moment...

"For all the focus on the Democrats, a former Bush official who predicts a coming bloodbath between the White House and disgruntled conservative Republicans brushed off the Pelosi-Hoyer tussle as much ado about process."

"'The Democrats are the sideshow,' he said. 'Bush self-destructing is the big story in town.'"

New York Daily News - Politics - Pelosi's bruising:

Oh Fuck

Wanted: man to land on killer asteroid and gently nudge it from path to Earth | Science | Guardian Unlimited:

"A huge asteroid is on a catastrophic collision course with Earth and mankind is poised to go the way of the dinosaurs."

"The proposals are at an early stage, and a spacecraft needed just to send an astronaut that far into space exists only on the drawing board, but they are deadly serious. A smallish asteroid called Apophis has already been identified as a possible threat to Earth in 2036."

"A 1bn tonne asteroid just 1km across striking the Earth at a 45 degree angle could generate the equivalent of a 50,000 megatonne thermonuclear explosion."

Workers without bosses at a turning point

Workers without bosses at a turning point: "Workers face off with the Argentine government on the status of their worker-controlled factories and other businesses. Since 2001, many have had to face bleak futures of unemployment. The workers, reclaiming their destinies, have opened closed plants and started operating outside the system to make a living. Many of these worker-controlled plants have operated for years in legal limbo."

Al-Jazeera, which already had an English language website, relaunches

Along with a new english language cable channel. Of course, good luck finding a cable system that carries it. For news junkies, the old site did not have RSS feeds (though there were folks that unofficially put them out), but the new one does.

See, for example, the Middle East section's RSS feed.

Document shows Bush guided CIA on detention

International Herald Tribune:

"WASHINGTON: The Central Intelligence Agency has acknowledged for the first time the existence of two classified documents, including one signed by President George W. Bush, that have guided the agency's interrogation and detention of terror suspects."

Charges Sought Against Rumsfeld

TIME.com: Exclusive: Charges Sought Against Rumsfeld Over Prison Abuse -- Page 1:

"New legal documents, to be filed next week with Germany's top prosecutor, will seek a criminal investigation and prosecution of Rumsfeld, along with Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, former CIA director George Tenet and other senior U.S. civilian and military officers, for their alleged roles in abuses committed at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison and at the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba."

Collective puts Marx's Das Kapital on stage | Special reports | Guardian Unlimited

As long as we don't have to eat ashen bread, I'm in...

Collective puts Marx's Das Kapital on stage | Special reports | Guardian Unlimited: "There is no wedding, no romantic interest and no plot to speak of. Instead the reader of Karl Marx's epic work, Das Kapital, is treated to a lengthy treatise on the division of labour and capitalist modes of production, offered up in long, convoluted sentences."

Editor and Publisher: U.S. Soldier Killed Herself After Objecting to Interrogation Techniques

U.S. Soldier Killed Herself After Objecting to Interrogation Techniques:

"Now we learn [via FOIA] that one of the first female soldiers killed in Iraq died by her own hand after objecting to interrogation methods used on prisoners.

She was Army specialist Alyssa Peterson, 27, a Flagstaff, Ariz., native serving with C Company, 311th Military Intelligence BN, 101st Airborne. Peterson was an Arabic-speaking interrogator assigned to the prison at our air base in troubled Tal-Afar in northwestern Iraq. According to official records, she died on Sept. 15, 2003, from a ?non-hostile weapons discharge.? "

[snip]

?Peterson objected to the interrogation techniques used on prisoners. She refused to participate after only two nights working in the unit known as the cage. Army spokespersons for her unit have refused to describe the interrogation techniques Alyssa objected to. They say all records of those techniques have now been destroyed. ...".

She was was then assigned to the base gate, where she monitored Iraqi guards, and sent to suicide prevention training. ?But on the night of September 15th, 2003, Army investigators concluded she shot and killed herself with her service rifle,? the documents disclose.

Rare Joint Editorial between Army, Air Force, Navy and Marines Calls for Rumsfeld to Resign

The Ross Report:

"An editorial scheduled to appear on Monday in Army Times, Air Force Times, Navy Times and Marine Corps Times, calls for the resignation of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld"

Judge Rejects Libby's Use of Memory Expert

Olbermann's Comment on Habeas Corpus Loss

See here to get a video of post festum's post on Olbermann...Here is another strong one, showing what Adams did for the sedition act, Wilson did to the pacifists (remember Debs for President, got a million votes), and Roosevelt did to the Japanese-Americans, Bush does...

YouTube - Olbermann's Comment on Habeas Corpus Loss

Threats to Hugo Chavez As Venezuela's December Presidential Election Approaches

Interesting piece detailing Chavez' support, program and opposition. In addition, the author hints at possible US responses. Quite an interesting projection, but alas it remains to be seen...One interesting sidenote, a US military base in Mariscal Estigarribia, Paraguay was opened (far from Venezuela) but this was stated/speculated:

It's also been reported that George Bush recently bought a 98,842 acre farm in Paraguay to go along with the 173,000 acres his father already owns there. Both properties border Bolivia and Brazil and comprise 2.7% of the whole country that comprises an area the size of the state of California. It's not known what the Bush family has in mind there or whether it may have any connection to a planned US military intervention in the region. It is known Paraguay has no laws criminalizing money-laundering, anti-terrorism or terrorist financing even though if does have an extradition treaty with the US. It's also important to be mindful of the fact that a dominant US family of two US presidents now owns a sizable piece of real estate in a country able to domicile a large number of US forces. It may only be for whatever personal use they have in mind, but it may not be and we can only speculate on what that may be.

Threats to Hugo Chavez As Venezuela's December Presidential Election Approaches: "It still remains to be seen what strategy the opposition will decide on or even which, if any, of them will show up on election day. Already Accion Democratica, Venezuela's largest opposition party in size of membership, at first refused to back any candidate. The AD's General Secretary, Henry Ramos Allup, said the only option is to abstain from the election and that Rosales, Borges (before he dropped out of the race) and other candidates are 'like drunks fighting over an empty bottle.' Others in his party disagree though calling for an exercise of 'democratic resistance.' Still it's clear to all in the opposition, Chavez is so far ahead in the polls there's no chance anyone can defeat him in a free, fair and open election so it's likely Rosales was chosen to run with something else in mind, and his strategy will show it as the campaign unfolds and especially as election day approaches.



Clearly the US had the final say in picking him for whatever strategy is planned that may have a lot to do with the fact that he's the governor of the state of Zulia that has 40% of Venezuela's oil and where in the past energy elites there supported the state's independence to free it from the government in Caracas. Rosales also favors this idea (likely with a little coaxing from his US allies) and has called for a referendum to let the people of Zulia decide. He's also very close to the Bush administration and was the only governor to sign the infamous '(Pedro) Carmona Estanga Decree' after the 2002 coup that dissolved the elected National Assembly and Supreme Court and effectively ended the Bolivarian Revolution and all the benefits it gave the Venezuelan people (for two days).



Rosales' electoral plan, with considerable US National Endowment for Democracy (NED)-funded through Sumate support, should become clear close to or right after the December 3 e"

11/1/06 Olbermann?s Special Comment

An incredible piece of oratory.

Crooks and Liars » Olbermann?s Special Comment : There is no line this President has not crossed ? nor will not cross ? to keep one political party, in power.:

"And finally tonight, a Special Comment.

On the 22nd of May, 1856, as the deteriorating American political system veered towards the edge of the cliff, Congressman Preston Brooks of South Carolina, shuffled into the Senate of this nation, his leg stiff from an old dueling injury, supported by a cane. And he looked for the familiar figure of the prominent Senator from Massachusetts, Charles Sumner.

Brooks found Sumner at his desk, mailing out copies of a speech he had delivered three days earlier ? a speech against slavery.

The Congressman matter-of-factly raised his walking stick in mid-air, and smashed its metal point, across the Senator's head.

Congressman Brooks hit his victim repeatedly. Senator Sumner somehow got to his feet and tried to flee. Brooks chased him, and delivered untold blows to Sumner's head. Even though Sumner lay unconscious and bleeding, on the Senate floor, Brooks finally stopped beating him, only because his cane finally broke.

Others will cite John Brown's attack on the arsenal at Harper's Ferry as the exact point after which the Civil War became inevitable.

In point of fact, it might have been the moment ? not when Brooks broke his cane over the prostrate body of Senator Sumner - but when voters in Brooks's district started sending him new canes.

Tonight, we almost wonder to whom President Bush will send the next new cane.

There is tonight no political division in this country that he and his party will not exploit, nor have not exploited; no anxiety that he and his party will not inflame.

There is no line this President has not crossed ? nor will not cross ? to keep one political party, in power.

He has spread any and every fear among, in a desperate effort to avoid that which he most fears ? some check, some balance against what has become not an imperial, but a unilateral presidency.

And now it is evident that it no longer matters to him, whether that effort to avoid the judgment of the people, is subtle and nuanced ? or laughably transparent.

Senator John Kerry called him out Monday.

He did it two years too late.

He had been too cordial ? just as Vice President Gore had been too cordial in 2000 ? just as millions of us, have been too cordial ever since.

Senator Kerry, as you well know, spoke at a college in Southern California. With bitter humor, he told the students that he had been in Texas the day before, that President Bush used to live in that state, but that now he lives in the state of denial.

He said the trip had reminded him about the value of education ? that quote "if you make the most of it, you study hard, you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, you can do well. If you don't, you can get stuck in Iraq."

The Senator, in essence, called Mr. Bush stupid.

The context was unmistakable: Texas;the state of denial;stuck in Iraq. No interpretation required.

And Mr. Bush and his minions responded, by appearing to be too stupid to realize that they had been called stupid.

They demanded Kerry apologize ? to the troops in Iraq.

And so he now has.

That phrase "appearing to be too stupid" is used deliberately, Mr. Bush.

Because there are only three possibilities here:

One, sir, is that you are far more stupid than the worst of your critics have suggested; that you could not follow the construction of a simple sentence; that you could not recognize your own life story when it was deftly summarized; that you could not perceive it was the sad ledger of your presidency that was being recounted.

This, of course, compliments you, Mr. Bush, because even those who do not "make the most of it," who do not "study hard," who do not "do their homework," and who do not "make an effort to be smart" might still just be stupid ? but honest.

No; the first option, sir, is, at best, improbable. You are not honest.

The second option is that you and those who work for you deliberately twisted what Senator Kerry said to fit your political template. That you decided to take advantage of it, to once again pretend that the attacks, solely about your own incompetence, were in fact attacks on the troops ? or even on the nation itself.

The third possibility is, obviously, the nightmare scenario; that the first two options are in some way conflated.

That it is both politically convenient for you, and personally satisfying to you, to confuse yourself with the country for which, sir, you work.

A brief reminder, Mr. Bush: You are not the United States of America.

You are merely a politician whose entire legacy will have been a willingness to make anything political ? to have, in this case, refused to acknowledge that the insult wasn't about the troops, and that the insult was not even truly about you either ? that the insult, in fact, is you.

So now John Kerry has apologized to the troops; apologized for the Republicans' deliberate distortions.

Thus the President will now begin the apologies he owes our troops, right?

This President must apologize to the troops ? for having suggested, six weeks ago, that the chaos in Iraq, the death and the carnage, the slaughtered Iraqi civilians and the dead American service personnel, will, to history, quote "look like just a comma."

This President must apologize to the troops ? because the intelligence he claims led us into Iraq proved to be undeniably and irredeemably wrong.

This President must apologize to the troops ? for having laughed about the failure of that intelligence, at a banquet, while our troops were in harm's way.

This President must apologize to the troops ? because the streets of Iraq were not strewn with flowers and its residents did not greet them as liberators.

This President must apologize to the troops ? because his administration ran out of "plan" after barely two months.

This President must apologize to the troops ? for getting 2,815 of them killed.

This President must apologize to the troops ? for getting this country into a war without a clue.

And Mr. Bush owes us an apology? for this destructive and omnivorous presidency.

?

We will not receive them, of course.

This President never apologizes.

Not to the troops.

Not to the people.

Nor will those henchmen who have echoed him.

In calling him a "stuffed suit," Senator Kerry was wrong about the Press Secretary.

Mr. Snow's words and conduct ? falsely earnest and earnestly false ? suggest he is not "stuffed" - he is inflated.

And in leaving him out of the equation, Senator Kerry gave an unwarranted pass to his old friend Senator McCain, who should be ashamed of himself tonight.

He rolled over and pretended Kerry had said what he obviously had not.

Only, the symbolic stick he broke over Kerry's head came in a context, even more disturbing: Mr. McCain demanded the apology, while electioneering for a Republican congressional candidate in Illinois.

He was speaking of how often he had been to Walter Reed Hospital to see the wounded Iraq veterans, of how, quote "many of the have lost limbs." He said all this while demanding that the voters of Illinois reject a candidate who is not only a wounded Iraq veteran, but who lost two limbs there: Tammy Duckworth.

Support some of the wounded veterans. But bad-mouth the Democratic one.

And exploit all the veterans, and all the still-serving personnel, in a cheap and tawdry political trick, to try to bury the truth: that John Kerry said the President had been stupid.

And to continue this slander as late as this morning ? as biased, or gullible, or lazy newscasters, nodded in sleep-walking assent.

Senator McCain became a front man in a collective lie to break sticks over the heads of Democrats ? one of them his friend; another his fellow veteran, leg-less, for whom he should weep and applaud, or at minimum about whom, he should stay quiet.

That was beneath the Senator from Arizona.

And it was all because of an imaginary insult to the troops that his party cynically manufactured ? out of a desperation, and a futility, as deep as that of Congressman Brooks, when he went hunting for Senator Sumner.

This, is our beloved country now, as you have re-defined it, Mr. Bush.

Get a tortured Vietnam veteran to attack a decorated Vietnam veteran, in defense of military personnel, whom that decorated veteran did not insult.

Or, get your henchmen to take advantage of the evil lingering dregs of the fear of miscegenation in Tennessee, in your party's advertisements against Harold Ford.

Or, get the satellites who orbit around you, like Rush Limbaugh, to exploit the illness ? and the bi-partisanship ? of Michael J. Fox ? yes, get someone to make fun of the cripple.

Oh, and sir, don't forget to drag your own wife into it.

"It's always easy," she said of Mr. Fox's commercials ? and she used this phrase twice ? "to manipulate people's feelings."

Where on earth might the First Lady have gotten that idea, Mr. President?

From your endless manipulation of people's feelings about terrorism?

"How ever they put it," you said Monday of the Democrats, on the subject of Iraq , "their approach comes down to this: the terrorists win and America loses."

No manipulation of feelings there.

No manipulation of the charlatans of your administration into the only truth-tellers.

No shocked outrage at the Kerry insult that wasn't; no subtle smile as the First Lady silently sticks the knife in Michael J. Fox's back; no attempt on the campaign trail to bury the reality that you have already assured that the terrorists are winning.

Winning in Iraq, sir.

Winning in America, sir.

There, we have chaos: joint U.S./Iraqi checkpoints at Sadr City, the base of the radical Shiite militias ? and the Americans have been ordered out by the Prime Minister of Iraq? and our Secretary of Defense doesn't even know about it!

And here ? we have deliberate, systematic, institutionalized lying and smearing and terrorizing ? a code of deceit, that somehow permits a President to say, quote, "If you listen carefully for a Democrat plan for success, they don't have one."

Permits him to say this while his plan in Iraq has amounted to a twisted version of the advice once offered to Lyndon Johnson about his Iraq, called Vietnam.

Instead of "declare victory ? and get out"? we now have "declare victory ? and stay, indefinitely."

And also here, we have institutionalized the terrorizing of the opposition. True domestic terror:

? Critics of your administration in the media receive letters filled with fake anthrax.

? Braying newspapers applaud, or laugh, or reveal details the FBI wished kept quiet, and thus impede or ruin the investigation.

? A series of reactionary columnists encourages treason charges against a newspaper that published "national security information" ? that was openly available on the internet.

? One radio critic receives a letter, threatening the revelation of as much personal information about her as can be obtained ? and expressing the hope that someone will then shoot her with an AK-47 machine gun.

? And finally, a critic of an incumbent Republican Senator, a critic armed with nothing but words, is attacked by the Senator's supporters, and thrown to the floor, in full view of television cameras, as if someone really did want to re-enact the intent and the rage of the day Preston Brooks found Senator Charles Sumner.

Of course, Mr. President, you did none of these things.

You instructed no one to mail the fake anthrax. Nor undermine the FBI's case. Nor call for the execution of the editors of the New York Times. Nor threaten to assassinate Stephanie Miller. Nor beat up a man yelling at Senator Allen. Nor have the first lady knife Michael J. Fox. Nor tell John McCain to lie about John Kerry.

No, you did not.

And the genius of the thing, is the same, as in King Henry's rhetorical question about Archbishop Thomas Becket: "Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest?"

All you have to do, sir? is hand out enough new canes."

Happy Halloween

The Cheney's Home at the Naval Observatory Has Important Guests

Guess we know a bit more about what the Cheney's are thinking now that we know that Mid-Atlantic Shredding Services was seen at their home earlier this month.

Remarks by the President at Georgia Victory 2006 Rally

In a last ditch effort to place blame squarely where it belongs, Bush finally explains to us who the real enemies are.

Remarks by the President at Georgia Victory 2006 Rally:

"So over the past five years we have acted on our philosophy and passed the largest tax relief since Ronald Reagan was in the White House. (Applause.)

In other words, we just didn't talk about philosophy -- there's too many philosophers in Washington -- we acted. We got the job done."

Extra credit to the first of us to use this in a final exam question.

Bush "Upbeat" on Iraq?

Just to add to the head-shaking about how far this can go before something, anything, gives...

Bush "Upbeat" on Iraq?: " Last week, President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and senior White House officials, in hopes of shoring up the GOP's sagging poll numbers before the November 7 midterm election, went on a media blitz, granting on-the-record interviews to dozens of conservative print and broadcast reporters. One of those interviews resulted in a backlash against the White House when Cheney told a reporter that, for him, water-boarding, a controversial technique used against terror suspects that simulates drowning, was a 'no brainer.'

But poring through another transcript revealed statements made by President Bush during a lengthy interview at the White House with conservative columnists that are equally disturbing but that have not been reported with the same gusto and zeal as the reports that Cheney backed water torture.

While discussing the situation in Iraq and explaining the reasons the United States launched a pre-emptive strike against the country, Bush told the journalists that 'I believe when you get attacked and somebody declares war on you, you fight back. And that's what we're doing,' according to a transcript of the interview."

State of the Presidential Press Briefing October 2006

I've got zero time right now, but I just can't let this friday's Press Briefing pass without documentation.

This might get long, but read on if you want a synopsis of the misama of misinformation that is the relationship between press and administration. Dick's balls got way out in front of him again, and now the WH team has to spin like there is no tomorrow to manage what could have been the admission of a war crime by a chief executive.

I don't know what pains me more...The insanity involved in grown ups talking to each other like this, or the total powerlessness of all legal or political institutions to hold the administration accountable.

10/27 Press Briefing by Tony Snow:

Q Tony, your argument that Vice President Cheney didn't know that he was being asked about water boarding or wasn't being asked about water boarding and didn't intend to give an answer that suggested he was saying the United States uses water boarding, it doesn't follow when you read the transcript and it doesn't follow sort of common sense.

MR. SNOW: Well, I'll tell you what he --

Q How can you really make that argument?

MR. SNOW: I'll tell you what he said. He was asked the question, "You dunk somebody's head in the water to save a life, is it a no-brainer?" And also, if you read the rest of the answer, he also -- the Vice President, who earlier had also been asked about torture, he said, "We don't torture."

Snow here shows some of his cards...No one brings up the issue of international law and just how serious such an admission would be legally and yet he intones:

Let me give you the no-brainers here. No-brainer number one is, we don't torture. No-brainer number two: We don't break the law, our own or international law. No-brainer number three: The Vice President doesn't give away questioning techniques...The Vice President says he was talking in general terms about a questioning program that is legal to save American lives, and he was not referring to water boarding.

He didn't say what he said. Besides, he would not have said it anyway.

Q Then how can you say that he's not referring to water boarding, when it was very clear, when you look at the whole context, not only that specific question --

MR. SNOW: Does the word --

Q -- but the one before?

MR. SNOW: Did the word "water boarding" appear?

Q It came up in the context of talking about interrogation techniques and the entire debate that has been conducted in this country.

Well, I've been reading these gaggles and briefings pretty regularly for the last six years, and I must admit that this was one occassion in which the press corps members were not willing to give the Administration the last word on anything.

Q Let's back it up here for a second, because what we're saying is -- and I've got the transcript -- "Would you agree a dunk in water is a 'no-brainer' that can save lives?" Vice President: "It's a 'no-brainer' for me." Tony --

MR. SNOW: Read the rest of the answer.

Q What could "dunk in the water" refer to if not water boarding?

MR. SNOW: I'm just telling you -- I'm telling you the Vice President's position. I will let you draw your own conclusions, because you clearly have. He says he wasn't talking --

Q I haven't drawn any conclusions. I'm asking for an explanation about what "dunk in the water" could mean.

MR. SNOW: How about a dunk in the water?

Alright, it is obvious to all thinking creatures that they've got no option left but deny deny deny. But still, how could he say it? What the hell could he be thinking of when he allows these words to pass over his lips?

But the press throws it right back in his face:

Q So, wait a minute, so "dunk in the water" means what, we have a pool now at Guantanamo, and they go swimming?

MR. SNOW: Are you doing stand up?

...

MR. SNOW: I'm telling you what the Vice President says. I can't go any further, and I'm not going to engage in what-could-he-mean because he said what he meant. He said -- he said he wasn't talking about water boarding.

Again we seen signs that the WH has tacitly or explicitly admitted that IF Dick HAD been talking about water-boarding as a tactic we use, THEN he'd be fucked.

Q One follow on this, because what you said in the morning was, "You think Dick Cheney is going to slip up on something like this?" Is it possible that he's not slipping up at all --

MR. SNOW: No.

Q -- but that he's winking to the base and saying --

MR. SNOW: No.

Q -- "of course we water board, and of course we'll do anything we need to to get the information because he knows that what they do --

MR. SNOW: I think you just won the cynical question of the year award. No, I don't.

Q How is that cynical?

Q No, no, no. There are more.

MR. SNOW: Jim, you can bang away as much as you want. I'm telling you what the Vice President's -- I talked to Lea Anne about it. She says no, he wasn't referring to water boarding; he was referring to using a program of questioning -- not talking about water boarding.

Let me put it this way. You got Dick Cheney, who had been head of an intelligence committee. He's been the Secretary of Defense. He's been the Vice President. He's not a guy who slips up, and he's also not a guy who does winks and nods about things that involve matters that you don't talk about for political reasons. Sorry.

But this time they fire back:

Q Why did the Vice President then, when the inference was clearly there from the questioner, who more than once referred to a dunk in the water --

MR. SNOW: I believe that his office is --

Q Let me finish. He, in the questioning, talked about how his radio listeners believe that this is a useful tool. "If it takes dunking someone in order to save lives, isn't it a silly debate to even be questioning that?" The Vice President says, "I do agree," later says, "That's been a very important tool that we've been able to secure the nation" -- referring to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

If the Vice President is so careful, why did he allow himself to answer a question in which "dunking in the water" was a part of that question?

MR. SNOW: The answer -- look, he was answering a question. And also as you know, he went on to talk about torture. Look, I've said what I'm going to say on it. I can't -- I really -- what you're asking me to do is to deconstruct something. I've asked what he meant. I've told you what he said he meant. I can't go any further than that, so you can ask all the whys and wherefores.

Did you catch that? Derrida's revenge?

And the hits keep on coming...

Q He was asked about a technique, and he responded to a technique, and said that he agreed --

MR. SNOW: No, he was not asked -- he was not asked, no.

Q Informally, he did.

MR. SNOW: No, informally doesn't work.

Q It does in the context of a radio interview --

Q You're quibbling over semantics, to borrow your phrase. You're quibbling over semantics.

MR. SNOW: I know. But, no, I think -- I actually think --

Q He's in a conversation with a radio audience to speak to the American people.

MR. SNOW: I understand all that.

Q It doesn't have to be legally precise. The Vice President understood what the questioner was asking.

MR. SNOW: I'm telling you -- and I will tell you once again -- the Vice President says that he refers to the fact that when you're questioning people, you don't torture. You obey the law, and you protect the American people. We're not going to go any further.

Q Tony, is it not possible that the two are not mutually exclusive? In other words, that the Vice President does not construe water boarding as torture, and therefore, to him --

MR. SNOW: No, no, no, no --

Q -- when he says "dunk in the water," that's a serious question. You can't just sort of beg off and say, I'm sorry, I'm not going to deconstruct it.

MR. SNOW: No, but, Jennifer -- Jennifer, you've listened -- there have been statements out of that office for two consecutive days that say they don't talk about water boarding, they don't talk about torture, they don't condone torture. They're not going to talk about techniques.

Q All we're asking is, what's a "dunk in the water"?

Q He agrees with it. We want to know what that means.

MR. SNOW: All right.

Q If he agrees with a "dunk in the water," then --

I guess grown ups do occassionally get tired of having to have discussions such as these. Exhibit A:

Q To say that Vice President Cheney doesn't make mistakes like this, he did go up and curse a senator to his face on the Senate floor, and accidentally shot his friend, so he's not perfect. (Laughter.)

Here comes Helen Thomas. Tony Snow's smart, though. He knows who she is and where she's coming from. She's one of "You Guys".

Q Is the emphasis on "we don't torture" when we send captives to notorious places that do torture? Does that absolve you?

MR. SNOW: No, it's -- as we've said many times, when we move people to another place, we have to have assurances that there will be no torture, and the treatment will be in accordance with international law.

Q Why do you send them there? Why? Why don't you keep them in your own captivity?

MR. SNOW: Well, wait a minute, I thought you guys wanted to close off Guantanamo. The only way you do that -- we quite often try to repatriate people to places --

I think Snow's assignment was to keep saying "VP meant dunk in water, like he said." And to say absolutely nothing more than this. Oops. Now watch him try to close THIS door. Exhibit B

Q I think the larger issue is credibility -- yours and the White House's. We're talking both in this instance and yesterday about very clear -- about specific language where you refute the semantic differences within the language and refuse to acknowledge what's very clear.

MR. SNOW: No, I can understand that people will look at this and draw the conclusions that you're trying to draw, as for yesterday.

I understand this. We will try to deal with it. I think you guys are -- maybe it's the end of the week. You're getting whipped into a frenzy.

Exhibit C

Q Do you have contempt for the American people, do you think they don't understand?

MR. SNOW: No, what I'm saying -- no, I think it is because you guys know Dick Cheney. You know the issue. I will go back and I will try to find some language for you.

Q We don't know him.

Q That's a logical fallacy.

Q Will he disavow dunking people in water as a part of the robust interrogation --

Q Clarify something. A couple seconds ago, you said, "I can understand why people look at this and draw this conclusion."

MR. SNOW: Well, because you're going to talk about dunks in the water, and I know people say, "oh, that must mean water boarding." I mean I understand that you'd draw that, so we'll get into it.

Q Wouldn't you draw that conclusion if you were reading this?

MR. SNOW: No, I wouldn't because I know the Vice President, and I know the way people think in the White House.

Ah, well, that settles it then.

The real meaning of Obama's speech. - By Amy Sullivan - Slate Magazine

The real meaning of Obama's speech. - By Amy Sullivan - Slate Magazine:

This is not to the point of the article, but a wonderful rendition of the DB value (which I put at -6.54) of Bush w/ regard to those voices he hears:

"For the past six years, the most prominent Christian in America has been the president. His belief is not of the 'God said it. I believe it. That settles it,' sort that fundamentalists embrace. Rather, Bush subscribes to a syllogistic doctrine of presidential infallibility: God works through Christians; I am a Christian; I have decided to do X; therefore, X is God's will."

Coming War w/ Iran (among others...)

Ellsberg's open call for insider disclosure of Iran Plans:

The Next War (Harpers.org): "A hidden crisis is under way. Many government insiders are aware of serious plans for war with Iran, but Congress and the public remain largely in the dark. The current situation is very like that of 1964, the year preceding our overt, open-ended escalation of the Vietnam War, and 2002, the year leading up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

In both cases, if one or more conscientious insiders had closed the information gap with unauthorized disclosures to the public, a disastrous war might have been averted entirely."

The complete work of Charles Darwin:

"The largest collection of Darwin's writings ever assembled"

Nov. 5th Surprise

In case you guys didn't see this piece in the Nation.

The US-backed special tribunal in Baghdad signalled Monday that it will likely delay a verdict in the first trial of Saddam Hussein to November 5. Why hasn't the mainstream media connected the dots between the Saddam's judgment day and the midterm elections?

Absolute Freedom and Terror

WSJ.com:

"A growing number of studies offer clues as to how terrorism and other deadly events affect people's voting decisions. The latest research shows that because such violent political acts are brutal reminders of death, they make conservatives, but not liberals, more hostile toward those perceived as different, and more supportive of extreme military policies, according to a study in April in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

For 20 years, researchers have been exploring how people manage the fear engendered by intimations of mortality. Reminded of the inevitability of their own death (which happens to a lesser degree by merely walking past a funeral parlor), people try to quench or at least manage the resulting 'existential terror' in several ways. They become more certain of their worldview or faith. They conform more closely to the norms of their society. They show greater reverence for symbols of their society, such as flags and crucifixes."

Bush Increasingly Finds Reality "Unacceptable"

Bush Confounded by the 'Unacceptable' - washingtonpost.com:

"President Bush finds the world around him increasingly 'unacceptable.'

In speeches, statements and news conferences this year, the president has repeatedly declared a range of problems 'unacceptable,' including rising health costs, immigrants who live outside the law, North Korea's claimed nuclear test, genocide in Sudan and Iran's nuclear ambitions.

[snip]

But a survey of transcripts from Bush's public remarks over the past seven years shows the president's worsening political predicament has actually stoked, rather than diminished, his desire to proclaim what he cannot abide. Some presidential scholars and psychologists describe the trend as a signpost of Bush's rising frustration with his declining influence.

In the first nine months of this year, Bush declared more than twice as many events or outcomes "unacceptable" or "not acceptable" as he did in all of 2005, and nearly four times as many as he did in 2004. He is, in fact, at a presidential career high in denouncing events he considers intolerable. They number 37 so far this year, as opposed to five in 2003, 18 in 2002 and 14 in 2001."

Chickens comin'...

Aide says White House mocked evangelicals: "A former senior presidential aide has accused the Bush administration of using evangelical Christians to win votes but then privately ridiculing them once in office. The allegations by David Kuo, the former deputy director of the White House office of faith-based initiatives, come at a devastating time, when the administration is counting on born-again Christians to vote in sufficient numbers to save the Republicans' hold on Congress in the November elections."

Iraqi Death Toll Exceeds 600,000

Iraqi Death Toll Exceeds 600,000, Study Estimates - WSJ.com:

"WASHINGTON -- A new study asserts that roughly 600,000 Iraqis have died from violence since the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003, a figure many times higher than any previous estimate.

The study, to be published Saturday in the British medical journal the Lancet, was conducted by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health by sending teams of Iraqi doctors across Iraq from May through July."

Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Gaza sliding into civil war

Gaza sliding into civil war:

When they buried Rafiq Siam, the traffic stopped and hundreds of armed men, some firing into the air, gathered at the Gaza mosque. Eight men wearing red berets and black combat uniforms lifted his body wrapped in a white shroud and Palestinian flag and carried it inside with as much ceremony as the pressing crowd would allow.

As Yusuf Siam stood to greet mourners, a boy arrived with a handful of papers marked from the al-Aqsa Brigade, a Fatah-affiliated militant group, and handed them out. The letter offered condolences to the family and then vowed revenge. 'For the families of the people who lost their sons at the hands of Hamas we swear that their blood will not be spilt for nothing,' it said. 'We will give a lesson to Hamas.'

There are signs that this is more serious than rhetorical rivalry between militants. 'The Palestinian situation is marred by sharp divisions and battling; it is a misery and shameful for any Arab and any Palestinian,' Egypt's foreign minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit, who has tried to mediate in this crisis, told the Al-Ahram newspaper this week. Some senior Palestinians are openly warning now of the danger of civil war."

Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Japan bans all trade with North Korea

Bush on the 'well, he started it' defense...

Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Japan bans all trade with North Korea: "Kofi Annan, the UN secretary-general, urged Pyongyang not to escalate an already 'extremely difficult situation'.

He urged the US to enter direct talks with North Korea, something which Washington consistently refuses to do. 'I have always argued that we should talk to parties whose behaviour we want to change,' Mr Annan said.

Mr Bush rejected criticism from Democrats that he had failed to build on a 1994 deal with North Korea agreed by then president, Bill Clinton.'It is the intransigence of the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-il, that led to the current situation,' said Mr Bush."

US Soldiers Wounded in Iraq Reaches Highest Monthly Level

US Soldiers Wounded in Iraq Reaches Highest Monthly Level: " The number of U.S. troops wounded in Iraq has surged to its highest monthly level in nearly two years as American GIs fight block-by-block in Baghdad to try to check a spiral of sectarian violence that U.S. commanders warn could lead to civil war.

Last month, 776 U.S. troops were wounded in action in Iraq, the highest number since the military assault to retake the insurgent-held city of Fallujah in November 2004, according to Defense Department data. It was the fourth-highest monthly total since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003."

"September was horrific" in terms of the toll of wounded, and if the early October trend continues, this month could be "the worst month of the war," said John E. Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org, a Virginia-based Web site that tracks defense issues.

The Observer | World | Hidden victims of a brutal conflict: Iraq's women

The Observer | World | Hidden victims of a brutal conflict: Iraq's women: "They came for Dr Khaula al-Tallal in a white Opel car after she took a taxi home to the middle class district of Qadissiya in Iraq's holy city of Najaf. She worked for the medical committee that examined patients to assess them for welfare benefit. Crucially, however, she was a woman in a country where being a female professional increasingly invites a death sentence.

As al-Tallal, 50, walked towards her house, one of three men in the Opel stepped out and raked her with bullets.

A women's rights campaigner, Umm Salam - a nickname - knows about the three men in the Opel: they tried to kill her on 11 December last year. It was a Sunday, she recalls, and 15 bullets were fired into her own car as she drove home from teaching at an internet cafe. A man in civilian clothes got out of the car and opened fire. Three bullets hit her, one lodging close to her spinal cord. Her 20-year-old son was hit in the chest. Umm Salam saw the gun - a police-issue Glock. She is convinced her would-be assassin works for the state."

All Things Interesting

uber-amazing canolli made by Frodo...so good.

Adorno and Flat Daddy

No, its not an Adorno riff on Jazz.

Read this Times Article on the 'replacement' daddies that are being handed out by the military and then tell me that Adorno is wrong. Just in case you wonder what a flat daddy is:
"Flat Daddies have been used by military families since at least 2003, when Cindy Sorenson of Bismarck, N.D., ordered a life-size photo of her former husband, Capt. Dave Bruschwein, on a piece of foam board when he was stationed in Iraq with the North Dakota National Guard."

Adorno's reflections on saying good-bye today:

To be lastingly apart and to hold love fast has become unthinkable. ?O parting, fountain of all words,? but it has run dry, and nothing comes out except bye, bye or ta-ta. Airmail and courier delivery substitute logistical problems for the anxious wait for the letter, even where the absent partner has not jettisoned anything not palpably to hand as ballast. Airline directors can hold jubilee speeches on how much uncertainty and sorrow people are thereby spared. But the liquidation of parting is a matter of life and death to the traditional notion of humanity. Who could still love if the moment is excluded when the other, corporeal being is perceived as an image compressing the whole continuity of life as into a heavy fruit? What would hope be without distance? Humanity was the awareness of the presence of that not present, which evaporates in a condition which accords all things not present the palpable semblance of presence and immediacy, and hence has only scorn for what finds no enjoyment in such simulation. Yet to insist on parting?s inner possibility in face of its pragmatic impossibility would be a lie, for the inward does not unfold within itself but only in relation to the objective, and to make ?inward? a collapsed outwardness does violence to the inward itself, which is left to sustain itself as if on its own flame. The restoration of gestures would follow the example of the professor of German literature who, on Christmas Eve, held his sleeping children for a moment before the shining tree to cause a déjà vu and steep them in myth. A humanity come of age will have to transcend its own concept of the emphatically human, positively. Otherwise its absolute negation, the inhuman, will carry off victory.

CNN.com - Military official: Iranian millions funding insurgency - Sep 28, 2006

here we go again...another front in the propoganda war...

CNN.com - Military official: Iranian millions funding insurgency - Sep 28, 2006: "A Shiite Muslim militia involved in the warfare between Sunni and Shiites in Iraq has received 'millions of dollars' and an assortment of weaponry from Iran, a senior U.S. military official says.

The official said Iran -- which is overwhelmingly Shiite and largely Persian -- tries to spread its largess to other militants as well, but can wield only so much influence throughout Iraq -- which, while predominantly Shiite, is largely Arab.

He said Iran is not trying to fuel civil war in Iraq, but rather is trying to make sure it retains some influence with whichever group comes out on top in Iraq.

The official, who asked to remain anonymous, briefed reporters Wednesday about the conflict in Iraq. A transcript of that briefing was issued Thursday. (Watch why the U.S. strategy may fail in Iraq -- 1:45)"

Bye-Bye Habeas Rights

Senate Narrowly Rejects Detainee Bill Amendment

By William Branigin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, September 28, 2006; 12:42 PM

The Senate today narrowly rejected a measure that would have allowed suspected terrorists to challenge their detention in federal court, as the body moved closer to passing a White House-backed bill to authorize special military tribunals for detainees held at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere.

The article goes on to say that the full measure, which the House already passed toady, will likely be passed by the senate later today.

Something for them to take home to voters, I guess. "Well folks, I voted for the bill that lets us torture terrorists and detain them forever without any possibility of them ever seeing a judge." Build a fence around America, authorize torture, suspend habeas corpus, all in a day's work for the 109th Congress.

The Blog | Steve Clemons: BIG NEWS: John Bolton Confirmation Battle Really, Really Dead | The Huffington Post

The Blog | Steve Clemons: BIG NEWS: John Bolton Confirmation Battle Really, Really Dead | The Huffington Post: "The last pre-election loophole through which John Bolton's confirmation might have snuck through the Senate Foreign Relations Committee was at 2:15 this afternoon at a previously called 'business meeting' of the Committee.

That meeting has been cancelled -- and with it even the dimmest chance of John Bolton being confirmed as US Ambassador to the United Nations.

Some have said that another effort could be mounted during a lame duck session of Congress, but there are several Republicans who will not feel bound by the White House in that circumstance; Dems as well -- who will vote against cloture on the floor of the Senate were it to get out of Committee then.

So, it's over. Wow.

John Bolton might agree to serve as the uncompensated Ambassador to the UN in a second recess appointment, or might agree to serve as a recess appointed political deputy at the UN and made 'acting Ambassador and Chief of Mission' at a pay cut.

Either way, Ambassador Bolton will fill his term as the only unconfirmed Ambassador at the United Nations in American history."

Chavez's Book Club?

After Chavez told everyone to read Chomsky's book, Hegemony or Survival, it lept to #1 on Amazon's best seller list. It was at around 20,000.

I heard this on the BBC this morning, but couldn't find a link to the story.

Diff between social and political philosophy

At times when I wonder what the real difference is between these, I think of Wolin's distinction below. So how do you sort out the answer to the question of difference here between social and political (and politics for that matter, e.g. do political philosophers necessarily do social philosophy?) ? This is from "Fugitive Democracy" in Benhabib's book "Democracy and Difference":

I shall take the political to be an expression of the idea that a free society composed of diversities can nonetheless enjoy moments of commonality when, through public deliberationsk collective power is used to promote or protect the well-being of the collectivity. Politics refers to the legitimized and public contestation, primarily by organized and unequal social powers, over access to the resources available to the public authorities of the collectivity. Politics is continuous, ceaseless, and endless. In contrast, the political is episodic, rare. (31)

English Russia » Soviet Propaganda Against USA (posters)

English Russia » Soviet Propaganda Against USA (posters)

Some very interesting historical pieces dealing with Vietnam and Chile too.
Russian below reads: Road to Peace

Washington Post: Innocent Canadian Tortured

washingtonpost.com Highlights - MSNBC.com:

"TORONTO, Sept. 18 - Canadian intelligence officials passed false warnings and bad information to American agents about a Muslim Canadian citizen, after which U.S. authorities secretly whisked him to Syria, where he was tortured, a judicial report found Monday."

The geist of Phil Ochs

Here's to the State of Dick Cheney:

"In a solo acoustic remake of folk singer Phil Ochs? 'Here?s to the State of Mississippi,' Eddie Vedder takes on Chief Justice John Roberts, Dick Cheney, Jerry Falwell, Alberto Gonzalez and, of course, President Bush."

Hard to make out all the new lyrics (co-authored with Tim Robbins), but if you watch the whole video you learn that Phil planted secret messages to later generations in the techniques required to play him.

Setting up a Frak Party

The Seattle Times: Nation & World: In a replay of Iraq, a battle is brewing over intelligence on Iran

I understand that Rumsfeld has set up a new office in the Pentagon that has the same personnel and same task as the pre-Iraq invasion's "Office of Special Projects". And this time they also have some "old friends" on the inside to allow them their "Some people say". Why fix it if it ain't broke?

The Seattle Times:

"Some officials at the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency and the State Department said they're concerned that the offices of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney may be receiving a stream of questionable information that originates with Iranian exiles, including a discredited arms dealer, Manucher Ghorbanifar, who played a role in the 1980s Iran-contra scandal.

Officials at all three agencies said they suspect that the dubious information may include claims that Iran directed Hezbollah, the Lebanese militant group, to kidnap two Israeli soldiers in July; that Iran's nuclear program is moving faster than generally believed; and that the Iranian people are eager to join foreign efforts to overthrow their theocratic rulers.

The officials said there is no reliable intelligence to support any of those assertions and some that contradicts all three."

Thai Prime Minister Declares State of Emergency - New York Times

Thai Prime Minister Declares State of Emergency:

"The sudden, well-orchestrated coup -- the first in 15 years and a throwback to an unsettled era in Thailand -- was likely to spark both enthusiasm and criticism at home and abroad. The military said it would soon return power to a democratic government but did not say when.

Striking when Thaksin was in New York at the U.N. General Assembly, army commander Gen. Sondhi Boonyaratkalin sent tanks and troops into the drizzly, nighttime streets of Bangkok. The military ringed Thaksin's offices, seized control of television stations and declared a provisional authority loyal to the king."

U.N. Inspectors Dispute Iran Report By House Panel - washingtonpost.com

U.N. Inspectors Dispute Iran Report By House Panel - washingtonpost.com: "U.N. inspectors investigating Iran's nuclear program angrily complained to the Bush administration and to a Republican congressman yesterday about a recent House committee report on Iran's capabilities, calling parts of the document 'outrageous and dishonest' and offering evidence to refute its central claims."

Snapshot of US public opinion, September 11 2006

Gotta love Doxastic Polling:

Rasmussen typically trends as a Republican polling outfit, for what it is worth...Many seem to be revising significant beliefs and adopting new self-understandings.

"Ever since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, many Americans have believed that the events of that horrible day changed the United States forever."

"In the immediate aftermath, 57% thought the nation had changed for the better. That number actually grew to 61% by January 2002. Now, half a decade later, just 21% of American adults hold that optimistic view. Fifty-four percent (54%) say the changes have been for the worse.

Three years ago, 67% of all Americans believed the world would be a better place if other countries were more like our own. Today, that number has fallen to 51%.

Early in 2002, 61% thought the country was safer than it was before 9/11 (about the same as believed that a year ago). Today, that number has fallen to 36%."

Today, 41% of Americans believe that the U.S. and its allies are winning the War on Terror. Two years ago, more than 50% held that view.

[snip]

"The increasing pessimism has caused Americans to revise their assessment of the way that President Bush responded to the terrorist attacks. Today, just 42% rate his performance as good or excellent. That?s down from 51% a year ago and 56% two years ago."

"Almost a third, 32%, now say the President?s response was poor."

A1 Washington Post, September 11 2006

Situation Called Dire in West Iraq:

"The chief of intelligence for the Marine Corps in Iraq recently filed an unusual secret report concluding that the prospects for securing that country's western Anbar province are dim and that there is almost nothing the U.S. military can do to improve the political and social situation there, said several military officers and intelligence officials familiar with its contents.

The officials described Col. Pete Devlin's classified assessment of the dire state of Anbar as the first time that a senior U.S. military officer has filed so negative a report from Iraq."

Christian Science Monitor: Conservative declared winner in Mexico. Revolution?

At last, a victor in Mexico
[snip]
Unlike Al Gore in 2000, Mexico's runner-up Andrés Manuel López Obrador (aka AMLO) has refused to concede defeat. The populist leader - who has slept in a tent with his followers in the middle of Mexico City for more than a month - has vowed to set up a "parallel" government and says that Mexico needs a "revolution."

[snip] But, never underestimate the power of working together to stop 'unruliness':

"Both parties have pragmatic reasons to work together to counterbalance the unruly behavior of the PRD," says David Shirk, director of the Trans-border Institute at the University of San Diego. "It's actually a good thing, in terms of coalition-building, made possible by the PRI's weakness, the PAN's slight gains, and the fact that those two parties can identify a common adversary in the PRD."
[snip]
But, any sort of rebellion seems to depend on whether Obrador can get people to sit out in the middle of the capital until sept. 16:

On Mexico's Independence Day, Sept. 16, the day Obrador has called for the national convention and the day the military usually marches down streets that are now blocked by protesters, confrontations are expected. "It would not be hard to imagine that he gets the demonstrators to stay in place. This produces a clash with military. That will have reverberations that we can't anticipate," says Mr. de la Garza.

AlterNet: War on Iraq: The 10 Most Brazen War Profiteers

AlterNet: War on Iraq: The 10 Most Brazen War Profiteers: "Halliburton has become synonymous with war profiteering, but there are lots of other greedy fingers in the pie. We name names on 10 of the worst."

Mexico protesters silence president

Mexico protesters silence president: "In a move that should awaken Americans from their slumber, leftist leaders denied President Fox access to parliament to give his farewell speech. This in the face of a growing disagreement over voter fraud, the same which had occurred in the United States where the Conservative party denied Blacks the right to vote in key districts and used rigged voting machines to give Bush an advantage. With growing dissent in Mexico, the leader of the opposition, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has said that a government in exile will be establish if a vote by vote recount is not ordered."

British Police Arrest 14 Men in Anti-Terror Raids - New York Times

uh-oh, thought police held psychic surveillance for months and raid halal restaurant:

British Police Arrest 14 Men in Anti-Terror Raids - New York Times: "
?All I can say is that our knowledge is increasing and certainly in terms of broad description, the numbers of people who we have to be interested in are into the thousands. That includes a whole range of people, not just terrorists, not just attackers, but the people who might be tempted to support or encourage or to assist,? he said."

Interesting Elitist Look at how the other 85% lives

From the Nyt: At 2-Year Colleges, Students Eager but Unready

Peak Oil

In case you guys didn't know, we're fucked. Even Bloomberg News has a report on it.

I think this site is fairly good at explaining it and dealing with counter args. Well, have a nice day.

PS where's my translation reward?